題:
具有非加權鍵的鍵盤與加權錘音作用的鍵盤的實際優勢是什麼?
Rockin Cowboy
2015-02-23 00:24:13 UTC
view on stackexchange narkive permalink

This is not a question about what type toy keyboard a beginning piano student should learn on if a real piano is not an option. I am talking about professional quality keyboards in the above (to well above) $1000.00 U.S. range.

I have seen many professional keyboard players who prefer the non-weighted type keyboards over the weighted hammer acoustic piano type feel - even on their digital pianos.

I am wondering if there are practical advantages for the non weighted or semi-weighted velocity sensitive type keyboard (organ type feel) vs. the full weighted hammer style (real piano type feel).

I own both types, but seem to gravitate towards the weighted hammer action, perhaps because there was always an acoustic piano in my home growing up and I got used to playing that. But my Yamaha digital piano (with 88 weighted keys) does not have all the synth sounds that my other keyboard has.

But is it just a matter of personal preference - or are there some things that are easier to do on a non-weighted hammer keyboard?

I am considering the purchase of a keyboard that I can use for recording (in-home studio for my personal work) as well as on stage for live performance. In other words, both a work-station keyboard and a stage keyboard. More likely a synthesizer that can play piano sounds - but also all the other sounds I could use. It seems that most synthesizer's have the non-weighted style keyboard feel. There must be a reason.

If there are decided advantages for the non-weighted vs hammer action keys, I could certainly learn to like that type better.

I am NOT asking for specific recommendations for which keyboard to get. I am only trying to decide if I might be better served with a non weighted type keyboard (even though I would have to learn to like it).

我認為在長時間使用帶加重鍵的鍵盤上使用觸後感會很不舒服。如果要使用它來說要應用顫音效果並且不希望加重的鍵在此過程中試圖反彈,就需要保持細膩。
@DaveEngineer我不太熟悉“觸後”。使用鍵盤作為Midi控制器輸入到錄音軟件中時,我可能會使用現場直播或更適合嗎?迄今為止,我大部分的鍵盤操作都是鋼琴式的,但我已經建立了家庭錄音室,也想開始使用鍵盤。
一旦完全按下按鍵,觸後功能便是次要功能,您可以在其中施加壓力來控制Midi(不要將其速度與其他功能混淆)。在一個好的鍵盤上,它可以分配/路由到任何東西。 LFO,音量,截止頻率和其他瘋狂內容,等等。您需要真正觀看視頻
在單簧管上施加壓力可以使音高彎曲。當然,合成器可以模擬這一點。
加權動作並不會真正影響觸後。加權與否,密鑰仍然希望重新出現。
注意“非加權”和“錘子”是互斥的。模仿鋼琴的錘擊動作的鍵盤將被加權。
@LaurencePayne好手抓勞倫斯。我編輯了問題的文本以反映您的正確觀察。我不知道為什麼現在沒有人知道這一點。
八 答案:
Stephen Hazel
2015-02-23 22:54:47 UTC
view on stackexchange narkive permalink

What I've found is that the acoustic piano is the most expressive when played softly. We all like loud, but anything can be loud and the ear will tune loud OUT after a while. But it pays attention when things get quiet. And that's where weighted keys really help - on a digital too. If you don't have that weight, you'll get a more frequent oops-BANG during the quiet times.

But light/springy keys do have advantages. More rapid attacks, glissandos are a lot easier. And cheap/light are nice advantages if you can deal with the "hard(er) to play soft" part.

So if most of your music is loud, in a bar playin rock, light keys might be great. If you're going deep into the expressive, you probably want weighted keys so your hands can relaaax and play sooo softly.

topo Reinstate Monica
2015-02-23 01:11:20 UTC
view on stackexchange narkive permalink
  • 如果您正在演奏風琴聲音,則可能希望鍵盤能像風琴一樣感覺和響應,而不是鋼琴
  • 可以進行非常淺的非加權操作,這對某些技術很有幫助(例如,我更喜歡觸發敲擊聲)
  • 製造成本更低,因此樂器也更便宜。
  • 該儀器攜帶較輕。

添加的註釋:大多數合成器除了對速度敏感外,還具有一整套方法來表達聲音,而不是對速度敏感-對於許多合成器播放器而言,它們都有一組很好的控制器來路由到表達/ CC比速度靈敏度更有價值

CC的縮寫是什麼?
(MIDI)連續控制器-您可以將MIDI消息發送到合成器,以在播放時更改聲音。
user19076
2015-02-23 14:38:19 UTC
view on stackexchange narkive permalink

Hammer action is noisier. Of course it is dwarfed by the sounds you hear, but when you have excellent reason for playing through headphones, that reason might also make light action desirable.

Also if your main instrument is not a grand piano but a harmonium or accordion or organ, there is no point in an percussive attack, and it may detract from the fine points of articulation on those instruments.

tuj
2015-03-24 01:00:12 UTC
view on stackexchange narkive permalink

我玩過兩種類型。非加權GOOD鍵盤對於非鋼琴演奏者來說非常容易演奏。如果您想要模擬真實鋼琴的力度感(力度),則錘子錘擊動作會更好。有人說,非加權或非錘擊動作是玩具。他們不是。其中一些非常好(這裡的Kawai K5000鍵盤是半配重,非錘擊,超快速的,並且具有觸後感和力度)。

所以問題是:您可以玩嗎非加權鍵盤上的某些類型的音樂更好?我會說肯定的。快速段落更容易演奏,顫音更快,按鍵響應更快。

同時嘗試一下。看看哪一個適合您。

pearcemerritt
2016-07-31 04:29:08 UTC
view on stackexchange narkive permalink

我認為非加權鍵的優勢在於,對於風琴音色,您可以進行塗抹/傾斜

Laurence Payne
2015-02-25 01:45:47 UTC
view on stackexchange narkive permalink

加重動作更容易彈奏鋼琴。不加重可輕巧地進行演出! (我認為加權是值得的!)

whatagainst
2015-03-23 18:49:41 UTC
view on stackexchange narkive permalink

鋼琴的構造可以演奏出細膩的音樂,其中一切都取決於可以運用各種音域的演奏者的熟練程度。

合成器是用來演奏不需要細微差別或播放器熟練的音樂的,它可以由每個合成器或外部控制器的信封控制。

加權鍵盤是在合成器“可讀”這些細微差別的情況下將細微差別應用於演奏的能力。除非您需要細微差別,否則就不需要加重鍵盤。

我個人每天都會選擇一個加重鍵盤-彈不加重鍵盤感覺就像在彈玩具鋼琴。

也可以沒有任何技能地成為教會風琴師嗎?
精通該特定技能–是的,您無法通過按鍵控制力度或在器官上施加細微差別。您可以通過外部控制器(例如在合成器上)進行操作。
Tony
2017-01-28 07:13:49 UTC
view on stackexchange narkive permalink

我已經學習鋼琴多年了,老實說,帶有加重琴鍵的數碼鋼琴會損壞我的手指,並導致我被處方服用iprophen 3個月,使它們恢復健康,進而破壞了胃部。我有一架6英尺長的三角鋼琴以及一個輕巧的數字鍵。兩者都使我的手指零問題。當時我正從一所大學的專業人士那裡上課,他無法發現我的演奏中會導致手指受傷的任何原因。因此,我出售加權數碼鋼琴以來(四年以來)一直沒有問題,直到上週我彈奏了數字加權鍵盤鋼琴,在近20分鐘的演奏中,我感覺完全一樣。小心,讓您的身體告訴您您喜歡哪個。

這真的沒有道理。按鍵完全是被動的,因此,如果您感到痛苦,則與您的技術有關。鋼琴老師不一定精通運動機能學。
您的最後一句話很有價值,但是在進行這樣的廣泛陳述時,我會格外小心。我使用帶有加重鍵的數碼鋼琴,沒有遇到任何此類問題。像往常一樣,在符合人體工程學的問題上,請勿“度過難關”。因為那隻是愚蠢的。嘗試診斷問題是正確的事情,但是,與Matthew一樣,我想不出加權鍵會引起類似痛苦的可能原因。
確實是一個奇怪的人。我大部分時間都在玩,而且幸運的是從未體驗過Tony所擁有的。
一種可能是,您演奏的特殊加權鍵數碼鋼琴在其他方面與6英尺三角鋼琴有所不同。也許它們以不同的角度傾斜在支架上,或者鍵盤的支架將按鍵放置在不同的高度,導致您改變攻角。只是我的猜測。


該問答將自動從英語翻譯而來。原始內容可在stackexchange上找到,我們感謝它分發的cc by-sa 3.0許可。
Loading...